AWS WAF vs Cloudflare WAF cost: a practical comparison checklist

AWS WAF vs Cloudflare WAF comparisons often go wrong because teams compare list prices without normalizing traffic shape. Use this checklist to compare apples-to-apples: baseline policies, evaluated requests, and the cost of security logging and analytics.

1) Normalize traffic volume (including spikes)

  • Average requests/month (steady state)
  • Peak hours and attack/bot scenarios
  • Include blocked traffic if it is still evaluated

Tooling: estimate WAF requests and model a surge scenario.

Worked comparison template (copy/paste)

  • Baseline: evaluated requests/month + policies/rules you run in steady state
  • Attack: extra evaluated requests during spikes (hours/days) + any temporary rules you enable
  • Logs & analytics: ingestion GB/day + retention days + query/scan frequency for dashboards
  • Extras: bot management, rate limiting, and any features you actually use (avoid comparing "default plans" to "fully loaded configs")

2) Compare baseline policy/rule costs

  • How many apps/environments require distinct policies?
  • How many rule groups (managed + custom) do you need?
  • Do you pay extra for bot management, rate limiting, or advanced features?

In practice, "how many distinct policies do we maintain?" is often the real baseline driver (copy/paste sprawl creates both cost and operational risk).

3) Don't ignore the second bill: logs and analytics

  • Log delivery and ingestion cost (GB/day)
  • Retention (GB-month)
  • Query/scan costs for dashboards and incident response

If you ship every event into logs and run wide-window dashboards, the log bill can rival the WAF bill.

4) Operational and architecture constraints

  • Where traffic is filtered (edge vs origin) and how that affects origin egress.
  • How quickly you can deploy rule changes safely.
  • How you export events into your existing security tooling.
  • Consider where bad traffic stops. If a platform stops traffic earlier, you may reduce origin load and downstream logging/compute costs.
  • Consider failure modes: a misconfigured rule rollout can create an outage and a cost spike (retries and incidents multiply traffic).

How to validate the choice

  • Run a short measurement window and estimate evaluated requests/day under normal traffic.
  • Keep an explicit spike scenario (your worst bot wave/attack window) and compare costs under that stress.
  • Verify the logging plan: what is logged, where it lands, and how long it is retained.

Related guides

Validation checklist

  • Validate the primary driver with measured usage from a representative window.
  • Confirm units and pricing units (per 10k vs per 1M, GB vs GiB) before trusting the estimate.
  • Re-check incident windows: retries/timeouts often multiply cost drivers.

Related reading

Sources


Related guides


Related calculators


FAQ

What usually drives WAF cost in practice?
Request volume (especially during spikes) plus your baseline policy/rule configuration. Logging, storage, and analytics can be a second bill that rivals the WAF line item.
Is a cheaper WAF always the better choice?
Not necessarily. You also need to consider the features you need (managed rules, bot protection, rate limiting), operational workflow, and where traffic is stopped (edge vs origin).
What's the fastest way to compare costs fairly?
Use the same evaluated request volume and the same surge/attack scenario for both, then include logging/retention costs and any add-ons you actually use.

Last updated: 2026-01-27