AWS RDS cost optimization (high-leverage fixes)
RDS spend is often predictable. That's good news: a few simple levers usually deliver meaningful savings without risky architecture changes.
0) Identify the real driver first (billing → metrics)
- In Cost Explorer, filter to Amazon RDS and group by Usage type. Identify the top 2–3 line items (compute, storage, backup storage, I/O).
- For the top line items, confirm the operational drivers from a representative 30–90 day window (CPU, storage growth, read/write IOPS, connections).
1) Right-size instances (and use schedules where possible)
- Downsize over-provisioned instances after measuring CPU/IO/memory headroom.
- Use non-prod schedules (stop/scale down) if supported by your ops model.
- For stable workloads, compare on-demand vs commitments and use an effective $/hour in your budget model.
Related: Reserved vs on-demand (break-even).
2) Control storage growth
Storage growth is easy to ignore until you hit a budget wall. Use Database Storage Growth Calculator to forecast the next 3-12 months.
- Set clear storage SLOs: growth rate, maximum allocated storage, and alert thresholds.
- Delete or archive cold data (especially in non-prod) before buying larger instances.
3) Treat backups as a first-class cost
- Set retention intentionally (don't default to "forever").
- Reduce churn where possible (batch writes, compaction, TTL strategies).
- Review snapshot frequency - more is not always better.
Related: Backups and snapshots.
If backup storage is already high, start by auditing manual snapshots and long-lived copies. Tool: estimate backup GB-month.
4) Avoid expensive I/O patterns
If your storage pricing charges for I/O, optimize query patterns and indexes, and avoid full table scans. Model I/O as "low / high" scenarios in the calculator to see sensitivity.
- Fix top queries first (indexing, query plans, caching) before scaling instance size.
- Watch incident-driven patterns: retry storms can multiply reads/writes and grow backups quickly.
- If you change storage type/IOPS, validate latency and throughput under peak load.
5) Compare architecture options (only when the simple levers are done)
- If read scaling is the pain point, compare read replicas vs moving to an architecture that fits your scaling model.
- If operational overhead is dominating, Aurora may win even if list price is higher. Related: RDS vs Aurora cost.
6) Sanity-check with a simple calculator
Use AWS RDS Cost Calculator to break your budget into compute, storage, backups, and I/O so you can see which lever matters most.
Validation checklist (prove savings without breaking reliability)
- After changes, confirm performance SLOs (latency, error rate) and DB health metrics remain acceptable.
- In Cost Explorer, compare the top RDS line items before/after (same workload window) to confirm the savings.
- For backup/retention changes, validate restore capability (test restores) before shortening policies.